GH’s daughter administers his DNA kits. She asked me an interesting question. On the DNA evidence, is this the same person:
- Ancestry – AnneYoungAU on Ancestry (shares 33 cM with my father)
- Family Tree DNA – Christine Anne Young (shares 93 cM with my father)
- GEDmatch – Anne Young A947648 (shares 63.5 cM with my father)
- My Heritage – Anne Young (shares 56.3 cM with my father)
If they are the same person, how can the results be so different?
Also, on the DNA evidence, are these the same person:
- Ancestry – RRC001 (shares 110 cM with my father)
- Family Tree DNA – R. Rafe Champion De Crespigny (shares 134 cM with my father)
- GEDmatch – RD A587626 (shares 113 cM with my father)
- My Heritage – Richard Rafe Champion De Crespigny (shares 98.3 cM with my father)
DNA aside, of course, we know that they are the same two people. The first is me, the second is my father.
The reason that the amount of shared DNA seems to vary so widely has to do with different assumptions and techniques used to calculate genealogically significant DNA. As a species we share DNA with other forms of life, but much of this is irrelevant genealogically. Discarding the parts we share as living beings and concentrating on what we share as family relatives introduces different emphases. The result is apparent differences between DNA analysis by different companies.
“If you choose to upload your AncestryDNA raw DNA results to another website, they will look different for a number of reasons. Other companies do not use the same algorithms, database or methods to translate the data. Only AncestryDNA has access to the unique information available on Ancestry, including the family trees and records to help power the accuracy of the results. In addition, the proprietary algorithms that we use to calculate results are based on documented family trees and a one-of-a-kind, comprehensive database of DNA samples from around the world.”
I was interested to see the variation in what segments my father and I shared with GH so I painted the matches from MyHeritage, FamilyTreeDNA and GedMatch at DNAPainter using the default parameter excluding segments under 7 centimorgans and also experimenting with including all segments greater than 1 centimorgan (the lowest threshold allowed).
Reviewing the data for segments of 7 centimorgans or more I found that MyHeritage did not include matching segments on chromosome 1. The segment matched with GH corresponds to a known pile up area and is indicated with grey shading on the DNAPainter diagram. It probably indicates shared DNA without genealogical significance.

DNA profile comparing matches for GH with Rafe and Anne: 7 centimorgan threshold
Reviewing the data for all segments greater than 1 centimorgan I found that Family Tree DNA and GedMatch included these segments whereas MyHeritage did not. I shared some small segments with GH but my father did not indicating that I did not inherit these segments from the most common recent ancestor GH, my father and I share. In general 7 centimorgans is considered necessary before a segment is possibly inherited from a common ancestor.

DNA profile comparing matches for GH with Rafe and Anne: 1 centimorgan threshold
The MyHeritage estimates of shared DNA make sense in view of the 7 centimorgan threshold and by not including the shared DNA at the pileup region on chromosome 1. Unfortunately because the detail of the match at AncestryDNA is not revealed by that company I cannot comment on what data they chose to include or exclude for their match.
Further reading
- “International Society of Genetic Genealogy Wiki ISOGG Wiki.” Identical by Descent, International Society of Genetic Genealogy, 23 Nov. 2018, isogg.org/wiki/Identical_by_descent.
Hi Anne. I’ve been following your exploits for quite some time now, and I really enjoy reading your research. Your DNA comparisons are really enlightening. Keep up the good work, and happy new year to you.
Mark in Sydney
LikeLiked by 1 person
Myself and the blow fly! 😀 I have been able to figure out some relationships with dna, but probably haven’t spent as much time on it as I might because many are before the point that I can know who is who (if that makes sense) I’m going to an online seminar in a few days on DNA. “Find Genealogical Gems in Your Genes with GEDmatch” I hope it magically opens my eyes being able to make more connections.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a really really slow process and I have not made the gains I was hoping to yet. I have confirmed some of the tree and made a few gains but DNA is only one of the pieces of evidence you need to make sense of the matches.
LikeLike
Pingback: Friday's Family History Finds | Empty Branches on the Family Tree
I find it frustrating that Ancestry can be great for family trees – but won’t tell me where the match is. Unless there is a shared ancestor hint (which can be wrong I’ve found) or I spot a familiar name, I do not bother with anyone under 4th cousin.
My Heritage tells me the match but I find the tree part very difficult to use and added to that many people only add a very few entries.
Gedmatch (Genesis now) does not seem to connect dna to gedcom and I’ve written too many ignored emails to bother contacting people in hope.
Chris
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Triangulating Matilda’s DNA | Anne's Family History
Pingback: Small matches in AncestryDNA | Anne's Family History